Los libros I y III de "Meteorológicos": ¿Una anomalía para la teoría de la visión aristotélica?

Abstract

La crítica contemporánea ha mostrado el contraste entre la teoría de la visión expuesta en los libros I y III de Meteoro-lógicos y el resto de obras mayores del corpus aristotelicum. En este artículo presentamos una clasifi cación de las principales interpre-taciones arrojadas sobre esta irregularidad. Finalmente, propondremos una exégesis de estos pasajes acorde con la teoría están-dar establecida por Aristóteles en las obras psicológicas. Contemporary criticism has re-vealed a disparity between the theory of vi-sion set forth in Meteorology and the rest of the major works of the corpus aristotelicum. In this article, we present a classifi cation of the main interpretations that have been of-fered for this irregularity. We then propose an exegesis of these passages according to the standard theory established by Aristotle in his psychological works

Contemporary criticism has re-vealed a disparity between the theory of vi-sion set forth in Meteorology and the rest of the major works of the corpus aristotelicum. In this article, we present a classifi cation of the main interpretations that have been of-fered for this irregularity. We then propose an exegesis of these passages according to the standard theory established by Aristotle in his psychological works.