Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCalvo Muñoz, Inmaculada
dc.contributor.authorGómez Conesa, Antonia
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Meca, Julio
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-03T07:38:26Z
dc.date.available2025-07-03T07:38:26Z
dc.date.issued2013-02-02
dc.identifier.citationCalvo-Muñoz I, Gómez-Conesa A, Sánchez-Meca J. Physical therapy treatments for low back pain in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Feb 2;14:55. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-55. PMID: 23374375; PMCID: PMC3568715.es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10952/9838
dc.description.abstractBackground: Low back pain (LBP) in adolescents is associated with LBP in later years. In recent years treatments have been administered to adolescents for LBP, but it is not known which physical therapy treatment is the most efficacious. By means of a meta-analysis, the current study investigated the effectiveness of the physical therapy treatments for LBP in children and adolescents. Methods: Studies in English, Spanish, French, Italian and Portuguese, and carried out by March 2011, were selected by electronic and manual search. Two independent researchers coded the moderator variables of the studies, and performed the effect size calculations. The mean effect size index used was the standardized mean change between the pretest and posttest, and it was applied separately for each combination of outcome measures, (pain, disability, flexibility, endurance and mental health) and measurement type (self-reports, and clinician assessments). Results: Eight articles that met the selection criteria enabled us to define 11 treatment groups and 5 control groups using the group as the unit of analysis. The 16 groups involved a total sample of 334 subjects at the posttest (221 in the treatment groups and 113 in the control groups). For all outcome measures, the average effect size of the treatment groups was statistically and clinically significant, whereas the control groups had negative average effect sizes that were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Of all the physical therapy treatments for LBP in children and adolescents, the combination of therapeutic physical conditioning and manual therapy is the most effective. The low number of studies and control groups, and the methodological limitations in this meta-analysis prevent us from drawing definitive conclusions in relation to the efficacy of physical therapy treatments in LBP.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAdolescentes
dc.subjectChildes
dc.subjectLow back paines
dc.subjectMeta-analysises
dc.subjectPhysical therapyes
dc.subjectEffectivenesses
dc.titlePhysical therapy treatments for low back pain in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis.es
dc.typejournal articlees
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses
dc.journal.titleBMC Musculoskeletal Disorderses
dc.volume.number14es
dc.issue.number1es
dc.description.disciplineTerapia y Rehabilitaciónes
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2474-14-55es
dc.description.facultyCiencias de la Saludes
dc.description.facultyFisioterapia, Podología y Terapia Ocupacionales


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional