Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorForner, Leopoldo
dc.contributor.authorLozano, Adrián
dc.contributor.authorMurcia, Laura
dc.contributor.authorSanz, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorLópez García, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Bernal, David
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Lozano, Francisco Javier
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-18T15:36:08Z
dc.date.available2025-02-18T15:36:08Z
dc.date.issued2024-03
dc.identifier.citationSanz JL, López-García S, García-Bernal D, Rodríguez-Lozano FJ, Forner L, Lozano A, Murcia L. Comparative bioactivity and immunomodulatory potential of the new Bioroot Flow and AH Plus Bioceramic sealer: An in vitro study on hPDLSCs. Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 5;28(3):195. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05593-7es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10952/9204
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate the cytocompatibility, bioactivity, and anti-inflammatory potential of the new pre-mixed calcium silicate cement-based sealers Bioroot Flow (BrF) and AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer (AHPbcs) on human periodontal ligament stem cells (hPDLSCs) compared to the epoxy resin-based sealer AH Plus (AHP). Materials and methods: Standardized discs and 1:1, 1:2, and 1:4 eluates of BrF, AHPbcs and AHP after setting were prepared. The following assays were performed: cell attachment and morphology via SEM, cell viability via a MTT assay, cell migration/proliferation via a wound-healing assay, cytoskeleton organization via immunofluorescence staining; cytokine release via ELISA; osteo/cemento/odontogenic marker expression via RT-qPCR, and cell mineralized nodule formation via Alizarin Red S staining. HPDLSCs were isolated from extracted third molars from healthy patients. Comparisons were made with hPDLSCs cultured in unconditioned (negative control) or osteogenic (positive control) culture media. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05. Results: Both BrF and AHPbcs showed significantly positive results in the cytocompatibility assays (cell metabolic activity, migration, attachment, morphology, and cytoskeleton organization) compared with a negative control group, while AHP showed significant negative results. BrF exhibited an upregulation of at least one osteo/cementogenic marker compared to the negative and positive control groups. BrF showed a significantly higher calcified nodule formation than AHPbcs, the negative and positive control groups, while AHPbcs was higher than the negative control group. Both were also significantly higher than AHP group. Conclusion: BrF and AHPbcs exhibit adequate and comparable cytocompatibility on hPDLSCs. BrF also promoted the osteo/cementogenic differentiation of hPDLSCs. Both calcium silicate-based sealers favored the downregulation of the inflammatory cytokine IL-6 and the calcified nodule formation from hPDLSCs. BrF exerted a significantly higher influence on cell mineralization than AHPbcs.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAH pluses
dc.subjectAH plus bioceramic sealeres
dc.subjectAnti-inflammatoryes
dc.subjectBioactivityes
dc.subjectBioroot Flowes
dc.titleComparative bioactivity and immunomodulatory potential of the new Bioroot Flow and AH Plus Bioceramic sealer: An in vitro study on hPDLSCses
dc.typejournal articlees
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses
dc.journal.titleClinical Oral Investigationses
dc.volume.number5es
dc.issue.number28es
dc.description.disciplineMedicinaes
dc.description.disciplineOdontologíaes
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00784-024-05593-7es
dc.description.facultyMedicinaes


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional