Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorOrtega Quiñonero, Paloma
dc.contributor.authorRemezal Solano, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorCarazo Díaz, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorPrieto Merino, David
dc.contributor.authorUrbano Reyes, María Isabel
dc.contributor.authorGarcía de Guadiana Romualdo, Luis
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Cendán, Juan Pedro
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-27T15:40:24Z
dc.date.available2025-01-27T15:40:24Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationP. Ortega-quiñonero, M. Remezal-solano, M.c. Carazo-díaz, D. Prieto-merino, M.i. Urbano-reyes, L. García De Guadiana-romualdo, J.p. Martínez-cendán. Impact of the human papillomavirus vaccination on patients who underwent conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2019. 40(3);402-407. https://www.ejgo.net/articles/10.12892/ejgo4628.2019es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10952/8956
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To test whether the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in patients undergoing loop diathermy conization (LEEP) for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2-3) is effective in preventing recurrence of CIN 2-3 in our area. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 242 patients undergoing LEEP for CIN 2-3 and 42.6% received the HPV vaccine (bivalent or tetravalent) immediately before or after conization. Follow up was conducted at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months to detect CIN 2-3 recurrence. Results: Regardless of the HPV type, 27 (11.1%) patients developed CIN 2-3 recurrence during post-LEEP follow up. Of the 70 vaccinated with bivalent vaccine, two (2.8%) showed recurrence, of the 33 vaccinated with tetravalent vaccine, three (9%), and of the 139 unvaccinated 61 (43.9%) developed recurrence. Of the patients infected with HPV genotypes 16/18, in the non-vaccinated group, 15 (21.7%) patients had recurrence, whereas in the vaccinated group, three (5.9%) were diagnosed with recurrence (p < 0/05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the vaccination acted as a protective factor for CIN 2-3 recurrence (OR: 0.360 (95% CI: 0.125-1.000; p < 0.05). However, neither the type of vaccine nor the time of vaccination showed a significant association with the onset of recurrence. Conclusions: The HPV vaccine appears to be a recommendable preventative strategy in reducing the risk of recurrent disease for patients treated for CIN 2-3.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectHuman papillomaviruses
dc.subjectVaccinees
dc.subjectCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaes
dc.subjectRecurrent disease; Conizationes
dc.subjectLEEPes
dc.titleImpact of the human papillomavirus vaccination on patients who underwent conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasiaes
dc.typejournal articlees
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses
dc.journal.titleEuropean Journal of Gynaecological Oncologyes
dc.volume.number40es
dc.issue.number3es
dc.description.disciplineMedicinaes
dc.identifier.doi10.12892/ejgo4628.2019es
dc.description.facultyMedicinaes


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional