Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarín Pagán, Cristian
dc.contributor.authorBlazevich, Anthony J.
dc.contributor.authorChung, Linda Haiwon
dc.contributor.authorRomero Arenas, Salvador
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Tomás T.
dc.contributor.authorAlcaraz Ramón, Pedro Emilio
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T11:24:50Z
dc.date.available2025-01-21T11:24:50Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-07
dc.identifier.citationMarín-Pagán, C., Blazevich, A. J., Chung, L. H., Romero-Arenas, S., Freitas, T. T., & Alcaraz, P. E. (2020). Acute Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Resistance Circuit Training vs. Traditional Strength Training in Soccer Players. Biology, 9(11), 383es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10952/8853
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses induced by high-intensity resistance circuit-based (HRC) and traditional strength (TS) training protocols. Ten amateur soccer players reported to the laboratory on four occasions: (1) protocol familiarization and load determination; (2) maximal oxygen consumption test; (3) and (4) resistance training protocols (HRC and TS), completed in a cross-over randomized order. In both protocols, the same structure was used (two blocks of 3 sets 3 exercises, separated by a 5-min rest), with only the time between consecutive exercises di ering: TS (3 min) and HRC (~35 s, allowing 3 min of local recovery). To test for between-protocol di erences, paired t-tests were applied. Results showed that oxygen consumption and heart rate during HRC were 75% and 39% higher than TS, respectively (p < 0.001). After the training sessions, blood lactate concentration at 1.5, 5 and 7 min and excess post-exercise oxygen consumption were higher in HRC. The respiratory exchange ratio was 6.7% greater during HRC, with no between-group di erences found post-exercise. The energy cost of HRC was ~66% higher than TS. In conclusion, HRC training induces greater cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses in soccer players and thus may be a time-e ective training strategy.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAerobic fitnesses
dc.subjectMuscle strengthes
dc.subjectOxygen uptakees
dc.subjectHeart ratees
dc.subjectFootballes
dc.titleAcute Physiological Responses to High-Intensity Resistance Circuit Training vs. Traditional Strength Training in Soccer Playerses
dc.typejournal articlees
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses
dc.journal.titleBiologyes
dc.volume.number9es
dc.issue.number11es
dc.description.disciplineActividad Física y Deportees
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/biology9110383es
dc.description.facultyDeportees


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional