| dc.contributor.author | López Vivancos, Abraham | |
| dc.contributor.author | González Gálvez, Noelia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Orquín Castrillón, Francisco Javier | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gomes de Souza Vale, Rodrigo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Marcos Pardo, Pablo Jorge | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-12T09:22:14Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-04-12T09:22:14Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10952/7565 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The popularity of the bench press (BP) is justified by being one of the most effective exercises
to improve strength and power in the upper body. The primary aim of this systematic review and
meta-analysis was to compare the electromyography activity (EMG) of pectoralis muscle between
BP and other variants of pectoral exercises (OP). Methods: This study was conducted according to
the PRISMA. Original research articles published by March 2023, were located using an electronic
search of four databases and yielded 951 original publications. This review included studies that
compared the EMG activity of pectoralis muscle between BP and OP. Data were extracted and
independently coded by three researchers. Finally, 23 studies were included for systematic review
and meta-analysis. Meta-analysis with fixed or random effect model was performed to infer the
pooled estimated standardized mean difference, depending on the heterogeneity. The studies were
grouped according to the type of the comparison: grip widths, type of grip, inclination of the bench,
stability, or exercise type. Results: The original option of BP activates the sternal portion significantly
more than the variant with the inclined bench (SMD = 1.80; 95%CI 0.40 to 3.19; p = 0.017). Performing
the exercise in an unstable situation produced significantly more activation during the concentric
phase than performing the exercise in a stable situation (SMD = −0.18; 95%CI −0.33 to 3.74; p = 0.029).
When comparing by type of exercise, greater activations are also seen in the original bench press
vs. the comparisons (p = 0.023 to 0.001). Conclusions: The results suggest that the traditional bench
press performed with the bench in a horizontal position, with a bar and a grip width between 150% and 200% of the biacromial distance (BAD) results from a greater EMG involvement of the pectoralis
major in most variations with the same relative load. However, the sternal portion of pectoralis major
showed greater activation with the declined variant of bench press. | es |
| dc.language.iso | en | es |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | Chest press | es |
| dc.subject | EMG | es |
| dc.subject | Push exercises | es |
| dc.subject | Resistance training | es |
| dc.subject | Upper extremity | es |
| dc.title | Electromyographic Activity of the Pectoralis Major Muscle during Traditional Bench Press and Other Variants of Pectoral Exercises: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis | es |
| dc.type | journal article | es |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es |
| dc.relation.projectID | CFE/CO/05-17 | es |
| dc.journal.title | Applied Sciences | es |
| dc.description.discipline | Actividad Física y Deporte | es |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3390/ app13085203 | es |