Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAbellán Ruiz, María Salud
dc.contributor.authorBarnuevo Espinosa, María Dolores
dc.contributor.authorContreras Fernández, Carlos J.
dc.contributor.authorLuque Rubia, Antonio J.
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Ayllón, Francisca
dc.contributor.authorAldeguer García, Miriam
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Santamaría, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorLópez Román, Francisco Javier
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-03T15:52:37Z
dc.date.available2026-02-03T15:52:37Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-01
dc.identifier.citationAbellán Ruiz, M. S., Barnuevo Espinosa, M. D., Contreras Fernández, C. J., Luque Rubia, A. J., Sánchez Ayllón, F., Aldeguer García, M., García Santamaría, C., & López Román, F. J. (2016). Digestion-resistant maltodextrin effects on colonic transit time and stool weight: A randomized controlled clinical study. European Journal of Nutrition, 55(8), 2389-2397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-015-1045-4es
dc.identifier.issn1436-6207
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10952/10760
dc.description.abstractPurpose Increased awareness of the importance of dietary fibre has led to increased interest in “functional” fibre components like digestion-resistant maltodextrin (RMD). This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study assessed the effects of RMD in the colonic transit time (CTT) and defecation characteristics (frequency, stool volume and consistency). Methods Sixty-six healthy adult volunteers (32 men) who did not have a daily defecation habit had a 7-day run-in period before the 21-day intervention period with RMD or placebo. CTT and segmental CTT (SCTT) were assessed by a single abdominal X-ray film taken at the end of both periods after radiopaque marker ingestion. Defecation characteristics and intestinal functions were also assessed, which were self-reported by patients. Intragroup comparisons were evaluated by Student’s paired t test, Bonferroni test and Chi-square test, while time comparisons by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and time-by-treatment interaction by repeated-measures ANOVA. Results Fifty-seven subjects were assessed for CTT (placebo, n = 28; RMD, n = 29). In the RMD group, the total CTT, left SCTT and rectosigmoidal SCTT decreased significantly compared to baseline (p < 0.01 each; −13.3, −4.7, −8.7 h, respectively). Significant differences between groups were observed in total CTT and left SCTT.Significant time-by-treatment interaction was observed in the RMD group for stool volume (p = 0.014), increasing 56 % compared to baseline (p < 0.01), while remained unchanged in the placebo group. Stool consistency was improved only in the RMD group (p < 0.01). No adverse effects related to study products were observed. Conclusions The results show that RMD improved CTT, stool volume, stool consistency and some intestinal functions in a healthy population.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectColonic transit timees
dc.subjectResistant maltodextrines
dc.subjectSoluble dietary fibrees
dc.subjectStool volumees
dc.subjectIntestinal functiones
dc.titleDigestion‑resistant maltodextrin effects on colonic transit time and stool weight: a randomized controlled clinical studyes
dc.typejournal articlees
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses
dc.journal.titleEuropean Journal of Nutritiones
dc.volume.number55es
dc.issue.number8es
dc.description.disciplineEnfermeríaes
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00394-015-1045-4es
dc.description.facultyCiencias de la Saludes


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional