Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Artificial intelligence for ovarian cancer diagnosis via ultrasound: a systematic review and quantitative assessment of model performance
| dc.contributor.author | Garcia Atutxa, Igor | |
| dc.contributor.author | Villanueva Flores, Francisca | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dudagotia Barrio, Ekaitz | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sanchez Villamil, Javier I. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Martínez Más, José | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bueno Crespo, Andrés | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-09T09:02:30Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-09T09:02:30Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-11-05 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Garcia-Atutxa I, Villanueva-Flores F, Barrio ED, Sanchez-Villamil JI, Martínez-Más J and Bueno-Crespo A (2025) Artificial intelligence for ovarian cancer diagnosis via ultrasound: a systematic review and quantitative assessment of model performance. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 8:1649746. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1649746 | es |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10952/10525 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: Early and accurate detection of ovarian cancer (OC) remains clinically challenging, prompting exploration of artificial intelligence (AI)-based ultrasound diagnostics. This systematic review and meta-analysis critically evaluate diagnostic accuracy, methodological rigor, and clinical applicability of AI models for ovarian mass classification using B-mode ultrasound. Methods: A systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted in PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus up to December 2024. Eligible studies included AI-based ovarian mass classification using B-mode ultrasound, reporting accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and/or area under the ROC curve (AUC). Data extraction, quality assessment (PROBAST), and metaanalysis (random effects) were independently performed by two reviewers. Heterogeneity sources were explored. Results: From 823 identified records, 44 studies met inclusion criteria, covering over 650,000 images. Pooled performance metrics indicated high accuracy (92.3%), sensitivity (91.6%), specificity (90.1%), and AUC (0.93). Automated segmentation significantly outperformed manual segmentation in accuracy and sensitivity, demonstrating standardization benefits and reduced observer variability. Dataset size minimally correlated with performance, highlighting methodological rigor as a primary determinant. No specific AI architecture consistently outperformed others. Substantial methodological heterogeneity and frequent risk-of-bias issues (limited validation, small datasets) currently limit clinical translation. Conclusion: AI models show promising diagnostic performance for OC ultrasound imaging. However, addressing methodological challenges, including rigorous validation, standardized reporting (TRIPOD-AI, STARD-AI), and prospective multicenter studies, is essential for clinical integration. This review provides clear recommendations to enhance clinical translation of AI-based ultrasound diagnostics. | es |
| dc.language.iso | en | es |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject | Meta-analysis | es |
| dc.subject | Artificial Intelligence | es |
| dc.subject | Ultrasound | es |
| dc.subject | Ovarian cancer | es |
| dc.subject | Early detection | es |
| dc.subject | Deep learning | es |
| dc.subject | Systematic review | es |
| dc.title | Artificial intelligence for ovarian cancer diagnosis via ultrasound: a systematic review and quantitative assessment of model performance | es |
| dc.type | review | es |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es |
| dc.description.discipline | Ingeniería, Industria y Construcción | es |
| dc.description.discipline | Medicina | es |
| dc.description.faculty | Escuela Politécnica | es |





