Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGarcia Atutxa, Igor
dc.contributor.authorVillanueva Flores, Francisca
dc.contributor.authorDudagotia Barrio, Ekaitz
dc.contributor.authorSanchez Villamil, Javier I.
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Más, José
dc.contributor.authorBueno Crespo, Andrés
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-09T09:02:30Z
dc.date.available2025-12-09T09:02:30Z
dc.date.issued2025-11-05
dc.identifier.citationGarcia-Atutxa I, Villanueva-Flores F, Barrio ED, Sanchez-Villamil JI, Martínez-Más J and Bueno-Crespo A (2025) Artificial intelligence for ovarian cancer diagnosis via ultrasound: a systematic review and quantitative assessment of model performance. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 8:1649746. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1649746es
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10952/10525
dc.description.abstractBackground: Early and accurate detection of ovarian cancer (OC) remains clinically challenging, prompting exploration of artificial intelligence (AI)-based ultrasound diagnostics. This systematic review and meta-analysis critically evaluate diagnostic accuracy, methodological rigor, and clinical applicability of AI models for ovarian mass classification using B-mode ultrasound. Methods: A systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted in PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus up to December 2024. Eligible studies included AI-based ovarian mass classification using B-mode ultrasound, reporting accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and/or area under the ROC curve (AUC). Data extraction, quality assessment (PROBAST), and metaanalysis (random effects) were independently performed by two reviewers. Heterogeneity sources were explored. Results: From 823 identified records, 44 studies met inclusion criteria, covering over 650,000 images. Pooled performance metrics indicated high accuracy (92.3%), sensitivity (91.6%), specificity (90.1%), and AUC (0.93). Automated segmentation significantly outperformed manual segmentation in accuracy and sensitivity, demonstrating standardization benefits and reduced observer variability. Dataset size minimally correlated with performance, highlighting methodological rigor as a primary determinant. No specific AI architecture consistently outperformed others. Substantial methodological heterogeneity and frequent risk-of-bias issues (limited validation, small datasets) currently limit clinical translation. Conclusion: AI models show promising diagnostic performance for OC ultrasound imaging. However, addressing methodological challenges, including rigorous validation, standardized reporting (TRIPOD-AI, STARD-AI), and prospective multicenter studies, is essential for clinical integration. This review provides clear recommendations to enhance clinical translation of AI-based ultrasound diagnostics.es
dc.language.isoenes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectMeta-analysises
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligencees
dc.subjectUltrasoundes
dc.subjectOvarian canceres
dc.subjectEarly detectiones
dc.subjectDeep learninges
dc.subjectSystematic reviewes
dc.titleArtificial intelligence for ovarian cancer diagnosis via ultrasound: a systematic review and quantitative assessment of model performancees
dc.typereviewes
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses
dc.description.disciplineIngeniería, Industria y Construcciónes
dc.description.disciplineMedicinaes
dc.description.facultyEscuela Politécnicaes


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional